Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:32

Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?

Plus, there’s no way to opt-out of using your data for training purposes, which is a huge issue (for the website version that is).

Though it’s hard to say about coding since it doesn’t have a feature like Claude Artifacts, where a separate window is created to see how the code looks as an output.

I’ve just tried Deepseek V3 just so I could answer your question.

Why are terrible, boring art pieces done by famous people worth so much while beautiful pieces done by amateurs are worthless?

So it’s a lot of copy and pasting when it comes to testing code on a separate website.

To answer your question, it definitely does work as an LLM.

But I find what makes it stand out from other LLMs is the Deepthinking feature.

Portugal beat Spain on penalties to win Nations League - Yahoo Sports

At first glance, it seems like a barebones version of GPT 4o or Microsoft Copilot, where you can upload documents or images (up to 50, text extraction only).

It breaks down an instruction (or multiple instructions) as a chain-of-thought reasoning (or multiple micro steps) as it shows you its thinking process.

So my recommendation is to run Deepseek V3 locally (requires extremely expensive hardware).

Youth overdoses from synthetic opioids are increasing. What parents should know - CNN